This program is tentative and subject to change.
Wed 19 NovDisplayed time zone: Seoul change
09:00 - 09:20 | |||
17:35 - 18:20 | |||
Thu 20 NovDisplayed time zone: Seoul change
10:30 - 11:50 | |||
10:30 8mTalk | Understanding the Characteristics of LLM-Generated Property-Based Tests in Exploring Edge Cases Main Track Hidetake Tanaka Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Haruto Tanaka Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Kazumasa Shimari Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Kenichi Matsumoto Nara Institute of Science and Technology Pre-print | ||
10:38 8mTalk | Understanding LLM-Driven Test Oracle Generation Main Track Adam Bodicoat University of Auckland, Gunel Jahangirova King's College London, Valerio Terragni University of Auckland | ||
10:46 8mTalk | Turning Manual Tasks into Actions: Assessing the Effectiveness of Gemini-generated Selenium Tests Main Track Myron David Peixoto Federal University of Alagoas, Baldoino Fonseca Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Davy Baía Federal University of Alagoas, Kevin Lira North Carolina State University, Márcio Ribeiro Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil, Wesley K.G. Assunção North Carolina State University, Nathalia Nascimento Pennsylvania State University, Paulo Alencar University of Waterloo File Attached | ||
10:54 8mTalk | Software Testing with Large Language Models: An Interview Study with Practitioners Main Track Maria Deolinda Cesar school, Cleyton Magalhaes Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Ronnie de Souza Santos University of Calgary | ||
11:02 8mTalk | HPCAgentTester: A Multi-Agent LLM Approach for Enhanced HPC Unit Test Generation Main Track Rabimba Karanjai University of Houston, Lei Xu Kent State University, Weidong Shi University of Houston | ||
11:10 8mResearch paper | Assertion-Aware Test Code Summarization with Large Language Models Main Track A: Anamul Haque Mollah University of North Texas, A: Ahmed Aljohani Rochester Institute of Technology, A: Hyunsook Do University of North Texas File Attached | ||
11:20 30mLive Q&A | Joint Q&A and Discussion #LLMforTesting Main Track | ||
11:50 - 12:30 | |||
11:50 8mTalk | The Future of Generative AI in Software Engineering: A Vision from Industry and Academia in the European GENIUS Project Main Track Robin Gröpler ifak - Institute for Automation and Communication, Magdeburg, Steffen Klepke Siemens AG, Jack Johns BT Group PLC, Andreas Dreschinski Akkodis, Klaus Schmid , Benedikt Dornauer University of Innsbruck; University of Cologne, Eray Tüzün Bilkent University, Joost Noppen , Mohammad Reza Mousavi King's College London, Yongjian Tang Siemens AG, Germany, Johannes Viehmann Fraunhofer FOKUS, Germany, Selin Şirin Aslangül , Beum Seuk Lee BT Group PLC, Adam Ziolkowski BT, Eric Zie Pre-print | ||
11:58 5mTalk | Where Do LLMs Still Struggle? An In-Depth Analysis of Code Generation Benchmarks (short paper-benchmark) Main Track | ||
12:03 5mTalk | Guidelines for Empirical Studies in Software Engineering involving Large Language Models ArXiv Track Sebastian Baltes Heidelberg University, Florian Angermeir fortiss GmbH, Chetan Arora Monash University, Marvin Muñoz Barón Technical University of Munich, Chunyang Chen TU Munich, Lukas Böhme Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany, Fabio Calefato University of Bari, Neil Ernst University of Victoria, Davide Falessi University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy, Brian Fitzgerald Lero - The Irish Software Research Centre and University of Limerick, Davide Fucci Blekinge Institute of Technology, Marcos Kalinowski Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Stefano Lambiase Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Denmark, Daniel Russo Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Mircea Lungu IT University, Copenhagen, Lutz Prechelt Freie Universität Berlin, Paul Ralph Dalhousie University, Christoph Treude Singapore Management University, Stefan Wagner Technical University of Munich Pre-print | ||
12:08 22mLive Q&A | Joint Q&A and Discussion #FutureofAIware Main Track | ||
15:00 - 15:29 | |||
15:00 29mTalk | Automated Extract Method Refactoring with Open-Source LLMs: A Comparative Study Main Track Sivajeet Chand Technical University of Munich, Melih Kilic Technical University of Munich, Roland Würsching Technical University of Munich, Sushant Kumar Pandey University of Groningen, The Netherlands, Alexander Pretschner TU Munich Pre-print | ||
16:00 - 16:50 | |||
16:00 16mTalk | Beyond Code Explanations: A Ray of Hope for Cross-Language Vulnerability Repair Main Track Kevin Lira North Carolina State University, Baldoino Fonseca Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Wesley K.G. Assunção North Carolina State University, Davy Baía Federal University of Alagoas, Márcio Ribeiro Federal University of Alagoas, Brazil | ||
16:16 16mTalk | PromptExp: Multi-granularity Prompt Explanation of Large Language Models Main Track Ximing Dong Centre for Software Excellence at Huawei Canada, Shaowei Wang University of Manitoba, Dayi Lin Centre for Software Excellence, Huawei Canada, Gopi Krishnan Rajbahadur Centre for Software Excellence, Huawei, Canada, Ahmed E. Hassan Queen’s University | ||
16:33 16mLive Q&A | Joint Q&A and Discussion #LLMAssessment Main Track | ||
16:50 - 17:35 | |||
16:50 8mTalk | Neuro-Symbolic Compliance: Integrating LLMs and SMT for Automated Financial Legal Analysis Main Track Yung Shen HSIA National Chengchi University, Fang Yu National Chengchi University, Jie-Hong Roland Jiang National Taiwan University File Attached | ||
16:58 8mTalk | Are We Aligned? A Preliminary Investigation of the Alignment of Responsible AI Values between LLMs and Human Judgment Main Track Asma Yamani King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Malak Baslyman King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Moataz Ahmed King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals File Attached | ||
17:06 5mTalk | A Vision for Value-Aligned AI-Driven Systems Main Track Humphrey Obie Monash University | ||
17:11 5mTalk | Generative AI and Empirical Software Engineering: A Paradigm Shift Main Track Pre-print | ||
17:16 19mLive Q&A | Joint Discussion #ResponsibleAI Main Track | ||
17:35 - 18:20 | |||
18:20 - 18:40 | |||
Accepted Papers
Call for Contributions
The 2nd ACM International Conference on AI-powered Software (AIware) is pleased to invite submissions to the Arxiv Track. This special track uniquely supports the dissemination and discussion of the most recent research findings that may not yet be published in traditional peer-reviewed conferences and journals. It enables researchers to present their innovative work promptly, ensuring that the community can discuss and build upon cutting-edge ideas without the delays associated with conventional publishing cycles. Accepted submissions will NOT appear in the proceedings.
Topics of Interest
We invite submissions of high-quality ArXiv papers. While submissions do not need to be available on ArXiv at the time of submission, the works should be made available on ArXiv before the conference date.
Submissions should address, but are not limited to, the following questions:
-
How would future software look like in the FM era?
-
How to integrate legacy software in future AIware?
-
Do existing programming models (e.g., object-oriented or functional programming) and SE practices (e.g., test-driven development and agile) remain suitable for developing and maintaining software in the FM era?
-
What roles do autonomous agents play in the development and maintenance of software in the FM era?
-
How will inner and open source collaboration evolve in the FM era?
-
What kind of release engineering practices do we need for FM-powered software applications? Are LLMOps comprehensive enough to capture the release engineering needs of AIware in the FM era?
-
How do we debug and monitor AIware in the FM era?
-
How should we change SE curriculum, training and mentoring in the FM era?
-
How to evolve FMs from the perspective of AIware and its makers in the FM era?
-
How do human interactions and perceptions shape the development and implementation of AIware in the FM era?
-
How do we measure and improve the trustworthiness of AIware in the FM era?
-
What are the implications and effectiveness of foundation models in improving software engineering practices and outcomes?
-
How does AIware impact developer productivity?
New this year
[New!] To encourage the submission of high-quality works that may not yet be available on ArXiv, this year we will also support articles that are not posted to ArXiv. However, to facilitate transparency, these submissions should be made available on ArXiv at the time of the conference (November 19, 2025).
Submission Instructions
As you prepare your submission, please consider the frequently asked questions (FAQs) below. Please submit your manuscripts at the following Google Form.
Review Process
Each submission will undergo a rapid review by the PC chairs of AIware main track (Jenny T. Liang and Maliheh Izadi). The emphasis will be on the novelty, impact, and relevance, of the research to the conference themes. The inclusion of publicly available supplemental materials, datasets, or artifacts is also a positive factor. If you have questions, please contact Jenny and Maliheh.
Important Dates
- Paper Submission: September 5, 2025 AoE
- Notification: September 12, 2025 AoE
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a page or word limit for submissions to the ArXiv Track?
No. There are no explicit page or word limit for submissions that will be enforced. However, keeping the length of the manuscript will be helpful to ensure the length of the paper is commensurate to its contribution. Authors can consider the following guidelines from the Main Track:
- Full-length papers (i.e., case studies, theoretical, applied research papers): 6 - 8 pages;
- Short papers (i.e., vision papers, new idea papers, and position papers): 2 - 4 pages;
- Literature reviews and surveys: 14 - 20 pages.
Is there a required template or class I should use?
No. There are no specific requirements for papers that are posted onto ArXiv. To submit articles not available on ArXiv, all authors can consider using the official “ACM Primary Article Template” as can be obtained from the ACM Proceedings Template page. LaTeX users should use the following latex code at the start of the LaTeX document: \documentclass[sigconf]{acmart}.
Should the submission be anonymized?
No. The submission does not need to be anonymized, as we expect the manuscripts to be publicly available on ArXiv.
Are there policies on supplemental materials, datasets, or artifacts?
There are no explicit policies about supplemental materials, datasets, or artifacts. However, they are highly encouraged to be created and referenced in the manuscript. Including supplemental materials, datasets, or artifacts will be seen as a positive factor while evaluating the manuscript.
How should I submit my manuscript to the ArXiv Track?
Closer to the submission date, there will be an online form where authors can either submit a public ArXiv link to their work. If the work is not yet uploaded publicly, we will also include a form field where you can upload your manuscript as a PDF file.